JD 2013 Data Breach
Platform · E-commerce retail and logistics · Direct sales + marketplace platform · China / Global
JD.com Chinese E-Commerce Platform Breach (2013): 141 Million User Accounts Including Passwords Exposed
Chinese e-commerce company.
Confirmed · ObscureIQ Intelligence
Breach Risk Index i
23/100
Lower riskHigher risk
Lower: limited current risk based on data value and recency.
Data Sensitivity i
StandardExposed data is largely lower-sensitivity. Standard identity-protection precautions are advised.
141.6MRecords
2013Year
The Breach Risk Index (BRI) is a proprietary 0–100 score rating how dangerous a breach is right now, based on how recently the data has been circulating on the dark web and how valuable it is to attackers.
Breach Summary
A JD.com breach dating to 2013 exposed roughly 141.6 million accounts (about 77 million unique email addresses), with the data surfacing for trade in 2016. Exposed data included email addresses, usernames, phone numbers, and passwords stored as SHA-1 hashes. JD.com attributed the compromise to an Apache Struts 2 vulnerability.
Full threat analysis, exploitation vectors, and principal guidance below.
10 additional sections · verified field analysis · defensive doctrine
Querying breach corpus…
Cross-referencing exposed field types…
Resolving threat-actor attribution…
Compiling principal risk advisory…
141.6M records analyzed
About JD
JD.com (Jingdong) is one of China’s largest e-commerce companies, operating a major online retail and logistics platform serving hundreds of millions of customers.
Why They Hold Your Data
Large-scale e-commerce platforms collect customer identity, contact data, payment information, order history, and logistics records across integrated retail ecosystems.
Recent Developments
JD.com apologized in 2016 when data traced to the incident began circulating. The company attributed the breach to a vulnerability in the Apache Struts 2 framework.
Data Points Exposed
4 verified field types
Email Address
Password High
Phone Number
Username
Breach Impact
The pairing of phone numbers with email and crackable SHA-1 credentials at massive scale supports credential stuffing, SMS phishing, and large-scale account-takeover attempts against Chinese consumers.
Exploitation & Downstream Threats
• Credential stuffing against reused passwords across other platforms | • SIM swap attacks where phone numbers are present | • Targeted phishing campaigns using exposed email addresses
Principal Risk Advisory
What this means for a principal
A consumer-service breach: contact and account data supports phishing, account takeover and profile enrichment. For a high-profile principal the main risk is credible impersonation and enrichment of existing exposure.
What You Should Do
- Reset any reused passwords and enable MFA on email first, then financial accounts.
- Guard against SIM-swap and vishing: add a carrier port-out PIN and verify any 'support' calls independently.
- Do not use unofficial 'am I affected' lookups; several are themselves harvesting operations.
How ObscureIQ Can Help
- Corpus confirmation: determine whether and where the principal (plus household and staff) appear in this dataset and which specific fields are exposed for them.
- Exposure mapping and footprint neutralization: cross-reference against broker-available data and suppress still-removable elements, prioritizing address and phone, since this record re-seeds broker networks.
- ThreatWatch tuned to this incident's identifiers and misuse pattern (impersonation and targeting patterns, not generic credential monitoring).
Protect Yourself
Check If You're Affected
Enter your email to check whether your data appears in this breach. We’ll send a 6-digit code to confirm it’s your address.
High-Risk? Get an Exposure Audit
Executives, public figures, and high-visibility operators can receive tailored exposure intelligence and hardening guidance.
Request Consultation