Matters we can talk about.
Client matters are not disclosed. These were published, because the person at the end of each was already named by the authorities or the subject was a public operation, so they are the ones we can show. Each is the Groundtruth method applied to a different question: what was asked, what was found, and how sure we are.
The question, the method and the finding, with the confidence stated. Not the identifiers. The method is the point, and the person at the end of it is not ours to publish.
DogeQuest
Where the data came from
A site published names, addresses, phones, employers and vehicle details of 1,700 Tesla owners and people linked to DOGE, then moved to the dark web. The firm traced the data to one 2021 parking app breach at a 98.2 percent match, enriched with broker records, and named the exposed population rather than guessing at it.
Read the matter →- Question
- Where did the targeting data originate
- Finding
- One breached third-party app, enriched with broker data
- Confidence
- High
The Cybertruck verification
Was the email real?
After the New Year's Day explosion in Las Vegas, a message claiming to come from the perpetrator was called a fake by a widely followed analyst. From the sender address alone, the firm reached the same named person by three independent paths. The analyst corrected himself. OSINT Industries wrote it up.
Read the matter →- Question
- Did this message come from the person it claimed
- Finding
- Authorship confirmed, by more than one independent path
- Confidence
- High on authorship; none on the contents
Bring us the thing that escalated.
Groundtruth answers who is behind it, where it came from, or whether it is what it claims to be, and delivers the finding in a form counsel can file on.
Every other one stays private.